A- de 2015
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Myriam Avila Roldán
✓Claimant Eduardo Enrique Quiñones Vargas
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Se confirma en su integridad el auto recurrido
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Recurso de súplica interpuesto en contra del auto que rechazó la demanda de la referencia porque el escrito de subsanación no remedió las falencias argumentativas señaladas en el auto de inadmisión.
La Sala Plena comparte las razones que dieron lugar al rechazo y, en consecuencia, decide CONFIRMAR el auto recurrido.
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- PRIMERO. CONFIRMAR el auto del 8 de mayo de 2015, proferido por la magistrada (e) Martha Victoria Sáchica Méndez, que rechazó la demanda de inconstitucionalidad de la referencia, formulada por el ciudadano Eduardo Enrique Quiñones Vargas.
- SEGUNDO. A través de la Secretaría General de la Corte, comuníquese el contenido de esta decisión a la recurrente, indicándole que contra esta no procede recurso alguno.
- TERCERO. Ejecutoriada esta decisión, archívese el expediente.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.